+357 25 800 000
·
info@demetriades.com
·
Mon - Fri 08:00-17:00
Get In Touch

By

Demetriades Office

Understanding the key aspects of mutual set-off in Cyprus Personal Insolvency Law

In the context of Cyprus’ personal insolvency law (Cap. 5/the “Law”), the concept of mutual set-off plays a crucial role in the settlement of debts and credits between a bankrupt individual and other parties (art. 35). Under the Law, mutual debts, credits, and transactions between a bankrupt person and others who have verified or are claiming the verification of a debt in the bankruptcy process must be carefully examined.

What is mutual set-off?

At its core, mutual set-off refers to the process where two parties owe each other money. Rather than each party paying the full amount they owe to the other, the debts are offset against each other, and only the net balance is settled. For example, if Party A owes Party B €10,000 and Party B owes Party A €5,000, the debts are set off against each other, and only the remaining €5,000 will be paid by Party A to Party B. This process helps streamline the insolvency process and ensures that the transactions are fair.

How does set-off apply in bankruptcy?

When a bankruptcy order is issued against an individual under Cap. 5, the process of set-off becomes crucial. If there are mutual debts, credits, or other transactions between the bankrupt person and any creditor (or potential creditor) involved in the bankruptcy, an account must be drawn up to determine the net balance between the two parties. This ensures that only the outstanding balance, and not the full amounts, are claimed or paid by either side. Essentially, creditors and debtors do not settle the entirety of what they owe each other; they only settle the remaining balance once mutual debts are offset.

Legal implications of set-off in bankruptcy

One of the key points for legal professionals advising clients in this area is that set-off is subject to specific limitations under the Law. The latter clearly stipulates that creditors are not entitled to claim the benefit of set-off if they were aware of the bankrupt individual’s financial troubles at the time when credit was extended. Specifically, if the creditor knew that the bankrupt individual had committed an act of bankruptcy when the credit was granted, the creditor will not be able to use the mutual set-off provision to reduce or eliminate their debt.

This provision aims to prevent abuse in the system, where creditors might deliberately extend credit to a person they know is in financial distress, only to later use the set-off to reduce their claims in the event of bankruptcy. The Law seeks to avoid situations where creditors take advantage of the bankruptcy process by entering into transactions with knowledge of the debtor’s insolvency status.

Key legal considerations

For those involved in bankruptcy proceedings, some key legal considerations must be highlighted:

  1. Verification of debts: Creditors involved in bankruptcy must ensure that their claims are verified properly in accordance with the bankruptcy order. Any errors in verification could impact their eligibility for set-off.
  2. Awareness of the bankrupt’s situation: As noted, one of the most important factors for clients is the issue of knowledge. Creditors must be cautious about the timing of credit extension to the bankrupt individual. If the creditor knew of the bankrupt’s financial difficulties or had reasonable grounds to believe the individual had committed an act of bankruptcy, the creditor’s ability to use set-off may be compromised. The consequences of acting improperly can result in the loss of the right to set off mutual debts, which could lead to greater financial exposure in the event of a bankruptcy.
  3. Proper documentation: It is crucial for both the bankrupt and the creditors to maintain clear and thorough records of mutual debts and credits. A detailed account of transactions will be necessary to calculate the balance due accurately and to ensure that all parties involved comply with the law.

Conclusion

For those navigating the complexities of personal insolvency law in Cyprus, the provisions surrounding mutual set-off offer significant legal considerations. While the set-off process can streamline debt recovery, it is subject to strict rules, particularly when a party is aware of the debtor’s insolvency. Creditors should seek expert legal advice which can guide them through these nuances to ensure compliance with the law, avoid potential abuse, and protect their financial interests.

For more information, please contact Charis Agapiou or your usual contact at Chrysses Demetriades & Co LLC.

Maritime Labour Convention amendments and compliance requirements for shipping companies

The 2022 amendments to the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) took effect in December 2024, introducing important updates to improve the rights and working conditions of seafarers globally. These changes represent a meaningful shift in maritime regulations and emphasize the industry’s growing focus on crew welfare, health, and safety.

Key areas of the 2022 MLC amendments

1. Social connectivity requirements: One major update requires shipping companies to provide internet access to crew members, so far as is reasonably practicable, while at sea. This provision, aimed at mitigating isolation on board, permits companies to apply reasonable charges for internet services. The focus on social connectivity addresses a vital aspect of crew well-being that has often been overlooked in maritime operations.

2. Enhanced food and catering standards: The amended MLC now mandates that shipping companies offer balanced, nutritious, and varied meals, along with safe drinking water, at no cost to crew members. Recognizing that proper nutrition directly impacts mental and physical health, these new standards require companies to provide food of sufficient quality and variety throughout seafarers’ employment, emphasizing the importance of a supportive work environment.

3. Medical care and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): The new amendments also require that crew members have timely access to medical care, especially in emergencies or during pandemics, and that they are supplied with appropriately sized PPE. This proactive approach to health and safety not only aligns with best practices but also reflects heightened regulatory attention to protecting crew members in all circumstances.

Documentation and industry standards

To comply with the 2022 MLC amendments, shipping companies must update their existing MLC documentation. This process presents an opportunity to align MLC compliance with other emerging industry standards, such as the Crew Welfare Self-Assessment questionnaire by RightShip, which evaluates various aspects of crew welfare and safety practices. Additionally, industry frameworks like DryBMS, RISQ 3.1, TMSA 3, and SIRE 2.0 also focus on crew-related procedures and can be integrated into Safety Management Systems to strengthen crew welfare practices.

Leading the way in crew welfare

The 2022 MLC amendments signal a significant shift toward improving the maritime work environment by prioritizing seafarers’ well-being. For shipping companies, adopting these standards offers an opportunity to cultivate a stronger safety culture and enhance operational efficiency. By embracing these updates, companies can build a reputation as responsible employers, contributing to a more sustainable and humane maritime industry. The MLC’s latest requirements serve as a foundation for advancing crew rights, shaping a future where crew welfare is integral to maritime success.

For more information please contact George McBride or your usual contact at Chrysses Demetriades & Co LLC.

Inspection Committees: Key challenges and opportunities in Cyprus Insolvency Legislation


Understanding Inspection Committees is vital for corporate insolvency proceedings. The role of creditors’ committees is complex but also critical. Their powers, such as approving settlements or determining the liquidator’s remuneration, are pivotal for fair outcomes. They act as a supervisory body, safeguarding creditors’ interests while ensuring the efficient and lawful handling of the liquidation process.

Table of Contents

  1. Role of inspection committees: Core responsibilities
  2. Challenges in balancing power and oversight
  3. The importance of transparency in insolvency

Role of creditors: Core responsibilities

Among the responsibilities of the Inspection Committees are:

  • Fixing the liquidator’s remuneration: This critical function ensures fair compensation for the liquidator without unduly depleting the company’s remaining assets. Yet, this task carries risks of potential conflicts of interest.
  • Approval of business continuity: Committees evaluate the feasibility of continuing a company’s operations. This requires not only financial expertise but also an ability to forecast market conditions and assess risk.
  • Legal decisions: They also approve or reject initiating or defending legal proceedings. Such decisions often have far-reaching financial implications for creditors and demand strategic foresight.

These powers demonstrate the committees’ importance in insolvency proceedings, but their complexity necessitates skilled decision-makers.

Challenges in balancing power and oversight

While the inspection committee wields significant authority, oversight mechanisms are necessary to prevent misuse. Several key issues emerge:

  • Potential conflicts of interest: Committee members may prioritize personal gains over collective creditor interests, leading to biased decisions.
  • Complexity in remuneration decisions: Setting liquidator remuneration often involves navigating contentious discussions, especially in high-value cases. Striking a balance between incentivizing efficiency and avoiding overpayment can be challenging.
  • Monitoring liquidation proceedings: Reviewing liquidation accounts requires technical expertise, which some committee members might lack. Without sufficient knowledge, irregularities or inefficiencies may go unnoticed, jeopardizing the process.

Clear guidelines, alongside external audits and oversight, are essential to mitigate these challenges and ensure effective committee functioning.

The Importance of transparency in insolvency

Transparency is foundational to a robust insolvency framework. Cyprus’ provisions requiring regular reporting and independent audits are steps in the right direction, but gaps remain:

  • Regular reporting: Requiring liquidators to submit timely reports ensures that creditors stay informed. However, delays or insufficient detail can undermine the process.
  • Independent audits: Committees can mandate audits to verify the financial integrity of liquidation proceedings. While essential, audits introduce additional costs and rely on the availability of skilled professionals.
  • Public accountability: The focus on creditor interests sometimes overlooks other stakeholders, such as employees or regulators. Broader disclosures could strengthen overall governance and transparency.

By prioritizing transparency, insolvency frameworks can better serve creditors, liquidators, and the wider economy, ensuring a fairer process for all.

Conclusion: Towards fair and transparent insolvency processes

The provisions governing inspection committees in Cyprus emphasize their crucial role in ensuring equitable outcomes during liquidation. However, challenges related to power dynamics, oversight, and transparency persist. Addressing these issues will require a combination of regulatory clarity, member training, and stricter enforcement.

Empowering committees with better resources and reinforcing transparency measures can foster trust in the insolvency process. These reforms will ultimately benefit all stakeholders, creating a fairer and more efficient system that inspires confidence in economic recovery and corporate accountability.

Keywords: inspection committees, creditors, insolvency, liquidator remuneration, transparency, audit, conflicts of interest

Sponsoring event that honors the spirit of Famagusta

We are proud to sponsor a special event that honors the enduring spirit of Famagusta. Organized by Diastasis Cultural Association, the event will take place at Pattihio Theatre in Limassol on 24 January 2025 at 20:00.

The program will feature performances by renowned artists, including songs from the digital album “Αμμόχωστος Δεσμώτισσα 50 Χρόνια Κατοχής” (Famagusta Bound 50 Years of Occupation)-a powerful tribute to the occupied city of Famagusta, with music by celebrated composers and lyrics based on the poetry of Menelaos Avraam.

We invite you to join us for an unforgettable evening that blends artistry with meaningful remembrance, honoring our heritage and inspiring hope for the future.

Tickets are available on www.ticketmaster.cy

Admission is free.

1 2 3